Home | Forums | Links | About Us / Rules | Admin Team | Donate



An oasis of independent thought

.... A New Day Is Dawning ...

 

 

JOIN THE BLUE REVOLUTION - Blue Donor stars for this year's fundrive!!  

 


Click here to view: The Impact of Violence in Gaza || Click here to donate to Gaza

Please donate
 Sat Jul 31st 2010, 06:53 AM (-8 GMT)
Top Top Forums Elections & Voting Rights
Welcome to our newest member 4Kaster1847 registered members | First-time visitor? Please register
Post-mortem: How many GOP-held House seats were stolen from the Dems?
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Original Post: Post-mortem: How many GOP-held House seats were stolen from the Dems?
TruthIsAll Moderator Click to send a private message to this memberClick to view this member's profileClick to view posts by this memberClick to add this member to your buddy list
Member since Sep 14th 2005
1399 posts
Thu Nov-09-06 07:02 AM
Original Post
 
 
Edited by TruthIsAll on Thu Nov-09-06 12:19 PM

Current scorecard: Dems 229, GOP 198, 8 Undecided

These are the FRAUD model results for the 62 GOP-held House seats:

1) The Dems won 24 in which they were LEADING in the projections
2) The Dems won 3 (NH-1,MN-1,PA-4) in which they TRAILED in the projections

3) The GOP won 13 in which they TRAILED in the projections 
4) The GOP won 18 in which they were LEADING in the projections 

5) 4 seats remain UNDECIDED


Note:
Ohio-6 seats: 4 may have been stolen.
Florida-5 seats: 1 is undecided, another may have been stolen.
Illinois-5 seats: 2 may have been stolen.


	HOUSE	       Latest Poll	 Projection   DemWin	Dem
			Dem	GOP	Dem	GOP	Prob	Win	Undec	Stolen?
N	Average		46.65	45.63	51.28	48.72	91	27	4	13
										
1	AZ 1		38	41	50.6	49.4	73			?
2	AZ 5		48	46	51.6	48.4	95	AZ 5		
3	AZ 8		53	41	56.6	43.4	100	AZ 8		
4	CA 4		43	50	47.2	52.8	0			
5	CA 11		48	46	51.6	48.4	95	CA 11		

6	CA 50		41	55	43.4	56.6	0			
7	CO 4		43	44	50.8	49.2	80			?
8	CO 5		42	51	46.2	53.8	0			
9	CO 7		54	38	58.8	41.2	100	CO 7		
10	CT 2		48	47	51.0	49.0	85		UND	

11	CT 4		51	44	54.0	46.0	100			?
12	CT 5		46	43	52.6	47.4	100	CT 5		
13	FL 13		49	47	51.4	48.6	93			?
14	FL 16		48	41	54.6	45.4	100	FL 16		
15	FL 22		50	48	51.2	48.8	89	FL 22		

16	FL 24		43	45	50.2	49.8	58		UND?	
17	ID 1		38	34	54.8	45.2	100			
18	IL 6		54	40	57.6	42.4	100			?
19	IL 10		48	46	51.6	48.4	95			?
20	IL 14		42	52	45.6	54.4	0			

21	IL 19		36	53	42.6	57.4	0			
22	IN 2		50	47	51.8	48.2	97	IN 2		
23	IN 8		53	43	55.4	44.6	100	IN 8		
24	IN 9		46	46	50.8	49.2	80	IN 9		
25	IA 1		49	42	54.4	45.6	100	IA 1		

26	IA 2		48	50	49.2	50.8	20	IA 2		
27	KY 3		52	44	54.4	45.6	100	KY 3		
28	KY 4		45	42	52.8	47.2	100			?
29	MN 1		47	50	48.8	51.2	11	MN 1		
30	MN 2		42	50	46.8	53.2	0			

31	MN 6		42	49	47.4	52.6	0			
32	NV 3		39	46	48.0	52.0	2			
33	NH 1		40	49	46.6	53.4	0	NH 1		
34	NH 2		46	47	50.2	49.8	58	NH 2		
35	NJ 7		43	46	49.6	50.4	34			

36	NM 1		53	44	54.8	45.2	100	       UND?		
37	NY 3		44	51	47.0	53.0	0			
38	NY 19		49	47	51.4	48.6	93	NY 19		
39	NY 20		53	42	56.0	44.0	100	NY 20		
40	NY 24		53	42	56.0	44.0	100	NY 24		

41	NY 26		46	50	48.4	51.6	5			
42	NY 29		53	42	56.0	44.0	100			?
43	NC 8		48	44	52.8	47.2	100		UND?	
44	NC 11		48	43	53.4	46.6	100	NC 11		
45	OH 1		48	46	51.6	48.4	95			?

46	OH 2		48	45	52.2	47.8	99			?
47	OH 6		58	39	59.8	40.2	100			?
48	OH 10		46	51	47.8	52.2	1			
49	OH 15		53	41	56.6	43.4	100			?
50	OH 18		53	33	61.4	38.6	100	OH 18		

51	OK 5		37	59	39.4	60.6	0			
52	PA 4		47	51	48.2	51.8	3	PA 4		
53	PA 6		49	44	53.2	46.8	100			?
54	PA 7		52	44	54.4	45.6	100	PA 7		
55	PA 8		50	47	51.8	48.2	97	PA 8		

56	PA 10		47	38	56.0	44.0	100	PA 10		
57	TX 22		36	28	57.6	42.4	100	TX 22		
58	VA 2		43	51	46.6	53.4	0			
59	VA 5		35	61	37.4	62.6	0			
60	VA 10		42	47	48.6	51.4	7			
61	WA 8		45	51	47.4	52.6	0			
62	WI 8		51	45	53.4	46.6	100	WI 8	


Here are the FRAUD ALERT results:
					
TIER 1 (MOST LIKELY): Dems win 8, GOP 4, Undecided 2
	      Dem	GOP	Prob Winner

1	CO 7	54	38	100%	Dem
2	OH 6	58	39	100%	Dem
3	OH 18	53	33	100%	GOP ?
4	IL 6	54	40	100%	GOP ?
5	TX 22	36	28	100%	Dem

6	AZ 8	53	41	100%	Dem
7	OH 15	53	41	100%	GOP ?
8	NY 20	53	42	100%	Dem
9	NY 24	53	42	100%	Dem
10	NY 29	53	42	100%	UND

11	PA 10	47	38	100%	Dem
12	IN 8	53	43	100%	Dem
13	ID 1	38	34	100%	GOP ?
14	NM 1	53	44	100%	UND

FRAUD ALERT********************************				
TIER 2: Dems win 14, GOP 11, Undecided 2

1	FL 16	48	41	100%	Dem
2	IA 1	49	42	100%	Dem
3	KY 3	52	44	100%	Dem
4	PA 7	52	44	100%	Dem
5	CT 4	51	44	100%	GOP ?

6	NC 11	48	43	100%	Dem
7	WI 8	51	45	100%	Dem
8	PA 6	49	44	100%	GOP ?
9	KY 4	45	42	99.8%	GOP ?
10	NC 8	48	44	99.8%	GOP ?

11	CT 5	46	43	99.6%	Dem
12	OH 2	48	45	98.8%	GOP ?
13	IN 2	50	47	96.8%	Dem
14	PA 8	50	47	96.8%	Dem
15	AZ 5	48	46	95.1%	Dem

16	CA 11	48	46	95.1%	Dem
17	IL 10	48	46	95.1%	GOP ?
18	OH 1	48	46	95.1%	GOP ?
19	FL 13	49	47	92.6%	GOP ?
20	NY 19	49	47	92.6%	Dem

21	FL 22	50	48	89.2%	Dem
22	CT 2	48	47	84.9%	UND
23	CO 4	43	44	79.5%	GOP
24	IN 9	46	46	79.5%	GOP
25	AZ 1	38	41	73.2%	GOP

26	FL 24	43	45	58.2%	UND
27	NH 2	46	47	58.2%	Dem

END FRAUD ALERT***************************				

TIER 3(UNLIKELY): Dems win 4, GOP 16, Undecided 1

1	NJ 7	43	46	34.0%	GOP
2	IA 2	48	50	20.5%	Dem
3	MN 1	47	50	10.8%	Dem
4	VA 10	42	47	7.4%	GOP
5	NY 26	46	50	4.9%	GOP

6	PA 4	47	51	3.2%	Dem
7	NV 3	39	46	2.0%	GOP
8	OH 10	46	51	1.2%	GOP
9	MN 6	42	49	0.4%	GOP
10	WA 8	45	51	0.4%	UND

11	CA 4	43	50	0.2%	GOP
12	NY 3	44	51	0.1%	GOP
13	MN 2	42	50	0.0%	GOP
14	NH 1	40	49	0.0%	Dem
15	VA 2	43	51	0.0%	GOP

16	CO 5	42	51	0.0%	GOP
17	IL 14	42	52	0.0%	GOP
18	CA 50	41	55	0.0%	GOP
19	IL 19	36	53	0.0%	GOP
20	OK 5	37	59	0.0%	GOP
21	VA 5	35	61	0.0%	GOP
	

http://progressiveindependent.com/dc/dcboard.php?a...



These FACTS are never discussed in the media.
- election fraud
- undecided voters break for the challenger, especially if the incumbent is unpopular. Bush was at 48%.
- Many newly registered voters are not included in LV (likely voter) polls.
- Since 1988, Democrats have won 60-70% of new voters. In 2008, Obama had 71%+.
- MILLIONS of mostly (70-80%) Democratic votes are uncounted in every election
- The 2004/2006/2008 Final National Exit Polls indicated there were millions of returning phantom Bush voters from the prior election (more than were alive).
- The Final National and State exit polls are always FORCED TO MATCH the recorded vote.
- By definition, the RECORDED VOTE never reflects the TRUE VOTE since millions of votes are UNCOUNTED in EVERY election.
- Uncounted votes alone provide overwhelming evidence that elections were stolen in 1968, 1988, 2000 and 2004.
- 1968: 6 million net uncounted votes.
Nixon won the recorded vote by 500,000.
- 1988: 10.6 million net uncounted votes. Bush won the recorded vote by 7m.
- 2000: 5.4 million net uncounted votes. Gore won the recorded vote by 540,000.
- 2004: Nearly 4 million uncounted votes.
Bush won the recorded vote by 3.0 million.
Kerry won the True Vote by 10m.
Approximately 5 million were switched from Kerry to Bush on UNVERIFIABLE voting machines.

- 2006 midterms: Democrats won by more than double the recorded 52-46%% margin.
10-20 House seats were stolen.

- 2008: Obama won by more than double his recorded 9.5m margin.

1988-2008: the average Democratic TRUE VOTE margin was reduced from 10% to a 4% RECORDED MARGIN by Election Fraud.

VOTER FRAUD was virtually non-existent.

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Permalink | | Reply | Top

3 replies to this thread:
Post-mortem: How many GOP-held House seats were stolen from the Dems? , TruthIsAll, Thu Nov-09-06 07:02 AM
#1: Help me out here TIA, James_Balding, Nov 09th 2006
#2: Exactly so., TruthIsAll, Nov 09th 2006
#3: the candidates not conceding or had stolen NEED your information, spacebuddy008, Nov 10th 2006

Reply #1: Help me out here TIA
James_Balding Donor2 Click to send a private message to this memberClick to view this member's profileClick to view posts by this memberClick to add this member to your buddy list
Member since Apr 27th 2006
747 posts
Thu Nov-09-06 07:53 AM
In response to Original Post

Are you saying that the election fraudsters were out in force, just like 2000,
2002 and 2004? It's just the overwhelming voter turnout that punished the
Republicans? In other words, the margins were so great, the election fraud
couldn't make-up the difference. Is what I am hearing correct?

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Permalink | | Reply | Top

Reply #2: Exactly so.
TruthIsAll Moderator Click to send a private message to this memberClick to view this member's profileClick to view posts by this memberClick to add this member to your buddy list
Member since Sep 14th 2005
1399 posts
Thu Nov-09-06 08:12 AM
In response to Reply #1

 
 

Also, we now realize that the Final Exit Poll is bogus. 
Note I said the FINAL. The early polls are good.
I proved it mathematically in 2005. 
Kerry won by over 7 million votes.

Read my two posts which are pinned at the top of this forum.
Check out my website for many detailed postings: truthisall.net

Now there are a number of ways to confirm that fraud occurred.

http://progressiveindependent.com/dc/dcboard.php?a...



These FACTS are never discussed in the media.
- election fraud
- undecided voters break for the challenger, especially if the incumbent is unpopular. Bush was at 48%.
- Many newly registered voters are not included in LV (likely voter) polls.
- Since 1988, Democrats have won 60-70% of new voters. In 2008, Obama had 71%+.
- MILLIONS of mostly (70-80%) Democratic votes are uncounted in every election
- The 2004/2006/2008 Final National Exit Polls indicated there were millions of returning phantom Bush voters from the prior election (more than were alive).
- The Final National and State exit polls are always FORCED TO MATCH the recorded vote.
- By definition, the RECORDED VOTE never reflects the TRUE VOTE since millions of votes are UNCOUNTED in EVERY election.
- Uncounted votes alone provide overwhelming evidence that elections were stolen in 1968, 1988, 2000 and 2004.
- 1968: 6 million net uncounted votes.
Nixon won the recorded vote by 500,000.
- 1988: 10.6 million net uncounted votes. Bush won the recorded vote by 7m.
- 2000: 5.4 million net uncounted votes. Gore won the recorded vote by 540,000.
- 2004: Nearly 4 million uncounted votes.
Bush won the recorded vote by 3.0 million.
Kerry won the True Vote by 10m.
Approximately 5 million were switched from Kerry to Bush on UNVERIFIABLE voting machines.

- 2006 midterms: Democrats won by more than double the recorded 52-46%% margin.
10-20 House seats were stolen.

- 2008: Obama won by more than double his recorded 9.5m margin.

1988-2008: the average Democratic TRUE VOTE margin was reduced from 10% to a 4% RECORDED MARGIN by Election Fraud.

VOTER FRAUD was virtually non-existent.

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Permalink | | Reply | Top

Reply #3: the candidates not conceding or had stolen NEED your information
spacebuddy008 Donor2 Click to send a private message to this memberClick to view this member's profileClick to view posts by this memberClick to add this member to your buddy list
Member since Nov 05th 2005
2414 posts
Fri Nov-10-06 09:22 AM
In response to Original Post

 
 

thank you so much for putting this together.
it has got to be hard time consuming work.

I am going to study this post and the others you mention.

I most likely get this to the democratic women in Ohio who are challenging
Deborah Pryce and Jean Schmidt.

I knew the republicans stole somewhere, they can't resist.

and I believe they kept it low-key so no one gets alarmed and changes the way
we vote, reforms or throws the machines in an incinerator.

and if we do not point out loudly and make an issue of all the fraud,
suppression, unfairness, cheating, intimidation, hoop-jumping they will cheat
big-time in 2008 and We will be left with a fuck-you McCain or  an asshole like
Schwarzenegger.

I heard Debra Bowen got elected in California and heard she is huge backer of
election integrity movement.

thanks TIA, for making the world a better place!

describing the latin root
of the word `religion' -- religare -- as being re-, back + ligare, link;
meaning to link back to the universe,
to be reconnected to the source of one's own genesis
and of all creation.
Webster's defines ligare as bind, (to tie together) which is close
to the meaning of link (to connect or tie).
In either sense, seen in this way, living one's life with such a "religious attitude"
expresses the urge to manifest
more of the wholeness of one's totality.
Seeking such meaning in one's experience of being
does not necessarily
relate to any specific creed.
~The New Myth> For Our Species: The Creation of Consciousness



You Inspired
CHANGE Transpired...


JFK quotes you may have not heard






Erikson was describing that ineffable quality we call charisma,
and the way an individual life history sometimes converges with the historical moment:
"Now and again," Erikson wrote, "an individual is called upon," to lift his personal conflicts
to the level of cultural conflicts,
"and to try to solve for all
what he could not solve for himself alone."


A man lives not only his personal life,
as an individual,
but also, consciously or unconsciously,
the life of his epoch and his contemporaries.

~Thomas Mann

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Permalink | | Reply | Top
Previous Topic | Next Topic

Important Notice: By participating on this discussion board, you agree to respect the rules of this website. Messages posted on Progressive Independent are the opinions of their authors and do not represent the opinions of Progressive Independent, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Multimedia | Reference | Links | Donate

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.