It's time to dispose of some voting machine myths perpetuated by the
BushCo media apologists.

There is no such thing as a computer "glitch".
The computer does what it's TOLD to do.
Nothing more. Nothing less.

The need to "calibrate" touchscreens is pure BS, a classic straw man.
Did you ever have to calibrate a Diebold ATM before you made a deposit?
Did you ever have to re-calibrate YOUR computer before linking to a blog?

Why is it that touchscreens are "mis-calibrated", yet switch Democratic votes to the GOP 95% of the time?
If it were a truly random occurrence, it would be 50%/50%.
The media and naysayers disregard this proof of programmable fraud.

Remember the 2004 EIRS database? Of 88 touchscreen incidents,
86 switched votes from Kerry to Bush.
These "glitches" occurred in different locations, mostly in FL and OH.
THEY WERE INDEPENDENT EVENTS.

So how do we compute the odds?
The probability is equal to the sum of the individual probabilities
of getting 86, 87 and 88 switches.

In Excel:
1.23689E-23 =BINOMDIST(86,88,0.5,FALSE)
2.84343E-25 =BINOMDIST(87,88,0.5,FALSE)
3.23117E-27 =BINOMDIST(88,88,0.5,FALSE)

THE PROBABILITY IS 1.26565E-23 or
1 in 79,010,724,999,066,700,000,000
That's ONE in 79 SEXTILLION.

I've written thousands of programs on mainframes, minis and PCs.
Any computational errors were due to faulty programming/logic.
It was NEVER a computer "glitch", just a programming error.
Every professional software developer knows that a program
never runs perfectly the first time.

Hell, anyone can program a computer to add. Even Diebold.
So what's the problem? They don't want to count the votes.
So how do they get the machines certified? Money talks.
And the Democrats won't do anything about it.

Diebold has had four years to clean up and publish the code.
But why should they? It does exactly what they want it to do.

If you still believe that the DRE problems are just "glitches"
and not due to malicious programming, you're living in a dream world.
_____________________________________________________________

This simple Excel model demonstrates one way of hacking a central tabulator for three sample precincts, each containing 100 voters, using a random number generator. To test the model, enter a percentage of democratic votes to be switched. You can also change the default number of (pre-hack) democratic votes in each precinct.

http://www.geocities.com/electionmodel/RandomVoteH...



Pass it on.

http://progressiveindependent.com/dc/dcboard.php?a...



These FACTS are never discussed in the media.
- election fraud
- undecided voters break for the challenger, especially if the incumbent is unpopular. Bush was at 48%.
- Many newly registered voters are not included in LV (likely voter) polls.
- Since 1988, Democrats have won 60-70% of new voters. In 2008, Obama had 71%+.
- MILLIONS of mostly (70-80%) Democratic votes are uncounted in every election
- The 2004/2006/2008 Final National Exit Polls indicated there were millions of returning phantom Bush voters from the prior election (more than were alive).
- The Final National and State exit polls are always FORCED TO MATCH the recorded vote.
- By definition, the RECORDED VOTE never reflects the TRUE VOTE since millions of votes are UNCOUNTED in EVERY election.
- Uncounted votes alone provide overwhelming evidence that elections were stolen in 1968, 1988, 2000 and 2004.
- 1968: 6 million net uncounted votes.
Nixon won the recorded vote by 500,000.
- 1988: 10.6 million net uncounted votes. Bush won the recorded vote by 7m.
- 2000: 5.4 million net uncounted votes. Gore won the recorded vote by 540,000.
- 2004: Nearly 4 million uncounted votes.
Bush won the recorded vote by 3.0 million.
Kerry won the True Vote by 10m.
Approximately 5 million were switched from Kerry to Bush on UNVERIFIABLE voting machines.

- 2006 midterms: Democrats won by more than double the recorded 52-46%% margin.
10-20 House seats were stolen.

- 2008: Obama won by more than double his recorded 9.5m margin.

1988-2008: the average Democratic TRUE VOTE margin was reduced from 10% to a 4% RECORDED MARGIN by Election Fraud.

VOTER FRAUD was virtually non-existent.

1 in 79,010,724,999,066,700,000,000! They are flattly going to steal this election, the unmistakable signs are everywhere. I frankly see it as a fait accompli. What is to be our response? That is the $79,010,724,999,066,700,000,000 question, IMHO!

An IBM 7094, TIA? I am old enough to know what a 7094 was



The IBM 7094 achieved expanded power through high-speed processing by providing its user with a basic machine operating cycle of 2 microseconds

http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/mainfra...

edit for link