Home | Forums | Links | About Us / Rules | Admin Team | Donate



An oasis of independent thought

.... A New Day Is Dawning ...

 

 

JOIN THE BLUE REVOLUTION - Blue Donor stars for this year's fundrive!!  

 


Click here to view: The Impact of Violence in Gaza || Click here to donate to Gaza

Please donate
 Sat Jul 31st 2010, 06:55 AM (-8 GMT)
Top Top Forums Elections & Voting Rights
Welcome to our newest member 4Kaster1847 registered members | First-time visitor? Please register
How many votes were electronically SWITCHED from Kerry to Bush?
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Original Post: How many votes were electronically SWITCHED from Kerry to Bush?
TruthIsAll Moderator Click to send a private message to this memberClick to view this member's profileClick to view posts by this memberClick to add this member to your buddy list
Member since Sep 14th 2005
1399 posts
Wed Sep-27-06 07:03 AM
Original Post
 
 
Edited by TruthIsAll on Sun Oct-01-06 05:46 AM

How many votes were switched from Kerry to Bush?
4.5 million.

Assumptions:
1) The Census estimate that 125.7mm (0.30%MoE) voted in 2004 is correct.
The 2004 total recorded vote was 122.3mm. Assume that the 3.4mm discrepancy is due to spoiled and/or lost ballots.

2) Allocate the 3.4mm lost/spoiled votes to Kerry (2.5mm) and Bush (0.9mm).
In every presidential election, the vast majority of spoiled/lost votes occur
in democratic minority districts.

3) Assume 95% of 2000 Gore and Bush voters turned out to vote in 2004.

4) Adjust the 12:22am National Exit Poll "How Voted in 2000" weights.
The 41% Bush/39% Gore weights are mathematically impossible.
Change to 38.2% Gore/37.8% Bush.

The new weights are a function of:
a) total recorded 2000 vote (Gore 51.0mm-Bush 50.45mm)
b) 0.87%/year mortality rate (3.5% over 4 years)
c) 95% turnout of 2000 Bush and Gore voters.

5) Assume the 12:22am NEP vote shares are correct.

Calculations:
1)Start with the Recorded Vote count:
Bush 62.0mm
Kerry 59.0mm
Other 1.3mm

2) Allocate 3.4mm spoiled/lost votes (2.5mm to Kerry; 0.9mm to Bush):
Bush 62.9mm
Kerry 61.5mm

3) Calculate the Kerry/Bush total vote share (see below):
Kerry 66.0mm (52.5%)
Bush 58.4mm (46.5%)
Other 1.3mm (1.0%)

4) Solve for X, the switched votes:
Kerry: X = 66.0 - 61.5
Bush:-X = 58.4 - 62.9

X = 4.5mm votes were switched from Kerry to Bush.

				Sensitivity analysis: switched votes (mm)
......Votes....
Recorded Lost 0 1 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
____________________________________________________________________
Kerry 59 2.5 61.5 62.5 63.5 64 64.5 65 65.5 66.02
Bush 62 0.9 62.9 61.9 60.9 60.4 59.9 59.4 58.9 58.43
Other 1.3 0 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.25
Total 122.3 3.4 125.7 125.7 125.7 125.7 125.7 125.7 125.7 125.7
-----
Kerry 48.2% 2.0% 48.9% 49.7% 50.5% 50.9% 51.3% 51.7% 52.1% 52.5%
Bush 50.7% 0.7% 50.0% 49.2% 48.4% 48.1% 47.7% 47.3% 46.9% 46.5%
Margin -3.0 1.6 -1.4 0.6 2.6 3.6 4.6 5.6 6.6 7.59
------------

NEP (adj. plausible weights, 125.7mm votes)
Voted in 2000 Demographic
Turnout:95%
Voted Weight Votes Kerry Bush Nader
No 21.77% 27.36 57.0% 41.0% 2.0%
Gore 38.24% 48.06 91.0% 8.0% 1.0%
Bush 37.83% 47.55 10.0% 90.0% 0.0%
Other 2.17% 2.72 71.0% 21.0% 8.0%
-----
Share 100% 125.7 52.5% 46.5% 1.0%
Vote 100% 125.7 66.0 58.4 1.3

Kerry margin: 7.59 million
---------

Sensitivity of Kerry Vote to Turnout
Turnout% Kerry% Margin(mm)
90 52.76 8.25
95 52.52 7.59
98 52.38 7.20
100 52.29 6.93
---------

Actual NEP (impossible weights,122.3mm votes)
Voted Weight Votes Kerry Bush Other
No 17% 20.79 57.0% 41.0% 2.0%
Gore 39% 47.70 91.0% 8.0% 1.0%
Bush 41% 50.14 10.0% 90.0% 0.0%
Other 3% 3.67 71.0% 21.0% 8.0%
-----
Share 100% 122.3 51.4% 47.6% 1.0%
Vote 100% 122.3 62.97 58.2 1.2

Kerry margin: 4.64 million






http://progressiveindependent.com/dc/dcboard.php?a...



These FACTS are never discussed in the media.
- election fraud
- undecided voters break for the challenger, especially if the incumbent is unpopular. Bush was at 48%.
- Many newly registered voters are not included in LV (likely voter) polls.
- Since 1988, Democrats have won 60-70% of new voters. In 2008, Obama had 71%+.
- MILLIONS of mostly (70-80%) Democratic votes are uncounted in every election
- The 2004/2006/2008 Final National Exit Polls indicated there were millions of returning phantom Bush voters from the prior election (more than were alive).
- The Final National and State exit polls are always FORCED TO MATCH the recorded vote.
- By definition, the RECORDED VOTE never reflects the TRUE VOTE since millions of votes are UNCOUNTED in EVERY election.
- Uncounted votes alone provide overwhelming evidence that elections were stolen in 1968, 1988, 2000 and 2004.
- 1968: 6 million net uncounted votes.
Nixon won the recorded vote by 500,000.
- 1988: 10.6 million net uncounted votes. Bush won the recorded vote by 7m.
- 2000: 5.4 million net uncounted votes. Gore won the recorded vote by 540,000.
- 2004: Nearly 4 million uncounted votes.
Bush won the recorded vote by 3.0 million.
Kerry won the True Vote by 10m.
Approximately 5 million were switched from Kerry to Bush on UNVERIFIABLE voting machines.

- 2006 midterms: Democrats won by more than double the recorded 52-46%% margin.
10-20 House seats were stolen.

- 2008: Obama won by more than double his recorded 9.5m margin.

1988-2008: the average Democratic TRUE VOTE margin was reduced from 10% to a 4% RECORDED MARGIN by Election Fraud.

VOTER FRAUD was virtually non-existent.

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Permalink | | Reply | Top

2 replies to this thread:
How many votes were electronically SWITCHED from Kerry to Bush? , TruthIsAll, Wed Sep-27-06 07:03 AM
#1: As usual, a lame response from OTOH and Febble on DU..., TruthIsAll, Sep 29th 2006
#2: Sadly I don't believe there is a, Kid of the Black Hole, Sep 29th 2006

Reply #1: As usual, a lame response from OTOH and Febble on DU...
TruthIsAll Moderator Click to send a private message to this memberClick to view this member's profileClick to view posts by this memberClick to add this member to your buddy list
Member since Sep 14th 2005
1399 posts
Fri Sep-29-06 08:15 AM
In response to Original Post

 
 
Edited by TruthIsAll on Sat Sep-30-06 04:29 AM

http://www.progressiveindependent.com/dc/dcboard.p...


http://progressiveindependent.com/dc/dcboard.php?a...



These FACTS are never discussed in the media.
- election fraud
- undecided voters break for the challenger, especially if the incumbent is unpopular. Bush was at 48%.
- Many newly registered voters are not included in LV (likely voter) polls.
- Since 1988, Democrats have won 60-70% of new voters. In 2008, Obama had 71%+.
- MILLIONS of mostly (70-80%) Democratic votes are uncounted in every election
- The 2004/2006/2008 Final National Exit Polls indicated there were millions of returning phantom Bush voters from the prior election (more than were alive).
- The Final National and State exit polls are always FORCED TO MATCH the recorded vote.
- By definition, the RECORDED VOTE never reflects the TRUE VOTE since millions of votes are UNCOUNTED in EVERY election.
- Uncounted votes alone provide overwhelming evidence that elections were stolen in 1968, 1988, 2000 and 2004.
- 1968: 6 million net uncounted votes.
Nixon won the recorded vote by 500,000.
- 1988: 10.6 million net uncounted votes. Bush won the recorded vote by 7m.
- 2000: 5.4 million net uncounted votes. Gore won the recorded vote by 540,000.
- 2004: Nearly 4 million uncounted votes.
Bush won the recorded vote by 3.0 million.
Kerry won the True Vote by 10m.
Approximately 5 million were switched from Kerry to Bush on UNVERIFIABLE voting machines.

- 2006 midterms: Democrats won by more than double the recorded 52-46%% margin.
10-20 House seats were stolen.

- 2008: Obama won by more than double his recorded 9.5m margin.

1988-2008: the average Democratic TRUE VOTE margin was reduced from 10% to a 4% RECORDED MARGIN by Election Fraud.

VOTER FRAUD was virtually non-existent.

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Permalink | | Reply | Top

Reply #2: Sadly I don't believe there is a
Kid of the Black Hole Admin Click to send a private message to this memberClick to view this member's profileClick to view posts by this memberClick to add this member to your buddy list
Member since Aug 01st 2006
2960 posts
Fri Sep-29-06 12:55 PM
In response to Reply #1

 
 

plain-speak way to present this to people which is all the more telling that so many people suspect election fraud as it is.

And yes, there are obvious disinfo ops on DU like these two appear to be.

-Mr Nice Guy

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Permalink | | Reply | Top
Previous Topic | Next Topic

Important Notice: By participating on this discussion board, you agree to respect the rules of this website. Messages posted on Progressive Independent are the opinions of their authors and do not represent the opinions of Progressive Independent, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Multimedia | Reference | Links | Donate

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.