Home | Forums | Links | About Us / Rules | Admin Team | Donate



An oasis of independent thought

.... A New Day Is Dawning ...

 

 

JOIN THE BLUE REVOLUTION - Blue Donor stars for this year's fundrive!!  

 


Click here to view: The Impact of Violence in Gaza || Click here to donate to Gaza

Please donate
 Sat Jul 31st 2010, 07:04 AM (-8 GMT)
Top Top Forums Elections & Voting Rights
Welcome to our newest member 4Kaster1847 registered members | First-time visitor? Please register
The Gender Vote: Further confirmation of a Kerry landslide
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Original Post: The Gender Vote: Further confirmation of a Kerry landslide
TruthIsAll Moderator Click to send a private message to this memberClick to view this member's profileClick to view posts by this memberClick to add this member to your buddy list
Member since Sep 14th 2005
1399 posts
Fri Sep-01-06 06:39 AM
Original Post
 
 
Edited by TruthIsAll on Sat Jan-05-08 07:45 AM

The Gender Vote: Further Confirmation of a Kerry Landslide
TruthIsAll

According to the 2000 and 2004 Final National Exit Polls (which is
always matched to the recorded vote) the two-party gender vote shares were:

2000: Gore won 55.7% of women voters, but only 44.2% of men.
2004: Kerry won 51.5% of women and 44.4% of men.

How come Bush sharply increased his share of Democratic women voters
while his share of Republican males declined? One would expect a
positive correlation between the two groups.

Demographic Trend 1972-2004
http://www.geocities.com/electionmodel/NEPHistCorr...

Science works by assuming that the explanation which best fits the data is correct.
But it must continue to be tested against new data which either strengthens the
case or causes it to be rejected in favor of a better explanation.

Over 10% (net) of white females who voted for Gore defected to Bush;
Over 4% (net) of black females who voted for Gore defected to Bush;
1.4% (net) of white males who voted for Bush defected to Kerry;
0.87% (net) of black males who voted for Gore defected to Bush.

According to the Composite 12:22am National Exit Poll, Kerry won 11.3m (58.2%) of
the 19.5m net 2-party increase in voters from 2000 (101.5m to 121m).

Given the increase, how does one explain the 3.3m discrepancy between
Bush's 11.5m (22.8%) vote increase and his 8.2m (41.8%) share of new voters?

Kerry's recorded 59.0m vote was an 8.0m (15.7%) increase over Gore's 51.0m.
With a 58.2% share of 19.5m new voters his vote should have increased by 11.3m.

So Kerry apparently won by 62.3-58.7m. But he actually did much better than that.

First, there was a net 2% defection of Bush 2000 voters to Kerry.
Second, returning Nader voters preferred Kerry by better than 3-1.
These factors produce a Kerry 64-57m margin - assuming 122.3m recorded votes
(see the “True Vote” calculation below).
But approximately 3.4m ballots were uncounted and about 75% were for Kerry.
Therefore his true margin was close to 9 million votes (66.6-57.9m).

To believe that Bush won by the 62-59m recorded vote, one must believe
that his “mandate” was provided by women who in 2000 either
a) did not vote, b) voted for Gore, or c) voted for Nader.
But according to the NEP, Kerry won New voters by 57-41%, Gore voters by 91-8%
and Nader voters by 64-17%. So why should you believe it?


__________________________________________________________

RECORDED 2000/2004 GENDER VOTE (2-PARTY)

FEMALE
Gore won 55.7% of females
Kerry won 51.5% of females, a 4.15% decline.

Therefore, 4.15/55.7= 7.45% (net) of female Gore voters switched to Bush.

MALE
Gore won 44.2% of males.
Kerry won 44.4% of males, a 0.23% increase.

Therefore, 0.23/55.8= 0.41% (net) of male Bush voters switched to Kerry.

__________________________________________________________

THE WHITE VOTE

FEMALE
Gore won 49.5% of the White Female vote.
Kerry won 44.4% of the White Female vote (5.04% decline).

Therefore, 5.04/49.5= 10.19% (net) of White Female Gore voters switched to Bush.

MALE
Gore won 37.5% of the White Male vote.
Kerry won 38.4% of the White Male vote (0.88% increase).

Therefore, 0.88/62.5= 1.41% (net) of White Male Bush voters switched to Kerry.

__________________________________________________________

THE BLACK VOTE

Gore won 94.0% of the Black Female vote.
Kerry won 90.0% of the Black Female vote (4.00% decline).
4.25% (net) of Black Female Gore voters switched to Bush.

Gore won 87.6% of the Black Male vote.
Kerry won 86.9% of the Black Male vote (.76% decline).

Therefore,0.87% (net) of Black Male Gore voters switched to Bush.

__________________________________________________________

NATIONAL EXIT POLL

2000 Final NEP
(matched to recorded vote)

Mix Gore Bush Buchn Nader
Male 48% 42% 53% 1% 3%
Fem 52% 54% 43% 1% 2%

Total 100% 48.3% 47.8% 1.0% 2.5%
Votes 105.4 51.0 50.5 1.1 2.9


2004 NEP 12:22am update
(13047 respondents)

Mix Kerry Bush Other
Male 46% 47% 52% 1%
Fem 54% 54% 45% 1%

Total 100% 50.8% 48.2% 1.0%
Votes 122.3 62.1 59.0 1.2


2004 Final NEP
(matched to recorded vote, 13660 respondents)

Mix Kerry Bush Other
Male 46% 44% 55% 1%
Female 54% 51% 48% 1%

Total 100% 47.8% 51.2% 1.0%
Votes 122.3 58.4 62.6 1.2


2004 True Vote
(adjusted to match "Voted 2000" True Vote - see below)

Mix Votes Kerry Bush Other
Female 53.6% 65.5 55.0% 44.0% 1%
Male 46.4% 56.7 49.5% 49.5% 1%

Total 100% 122.3 52.4% 46.6% 1.0%
64.1 57.0 1.2

__________________________________________________________


DEMOCRATIC 2-PARTY GENDER VOTE PERCENTAGE
Year 1992 1996 2000 2004 Change Wtd
Total 53.1 54.4 50.0 48.5 (1.52)(1.52)

Male 51.9 49.4 44.2 44.4 0.23 0.11
Female 54.9 58.7 55.7 51.5 (4.15) (2.24)

WHITE
Male 48.1 43.7 37.5 38.4 0.88 0.32
Female 50.0 52.7 49.5 44.4 (5.04) (2.07)

BLACK
Male 85.7 83.9 87.6 86.9 (0.76) (0.04)
Female 91.6 91.8 94.0 90.0 (4.00) (0.28)

__________________________________________________________

STATE EXIT POLL COMPOSITE
Nov. 3, 12:40am
72,714 respondents

Gender Weight Votes Kerry Bush Nader
Female 53.76% 65.7 52.4% 47.0% 0.6%
Male 46.24% 56.5 47.0% 52.0% 1.0%

Votes 122.3 61.5 59.7 0.97
50.3% 48.9% 0.8%

__________________________________________________________


NATIONAL EXIT POLL TIMELINE
Gender Demographic

Sample MIX Kerry Gender Vote
Update Size Female Male Female Male Total
4:00pm 8349 58% 42% 53% 47% 50.48%
7:33pm 11027 54% 46% 54% 47% 50.78%
12:22am 13047 54% 46% 54% 47% 50.78%
1:25pm 13660 54% 46% 51% 44% 47.78%

__________________________________________________________

NATIONAL EXIT POLL
Nov.3, 12:22am: 13047 respondents

VOTED IN 2000

Weights adjusted based on
2000 recorded vote;
3.5% voter mortality;
98% turnout of 2000 voters

Adjusted Reported
Voted Mix Kerry Bush Other Mix Kerry Bush Other
No 23.6 19.3% 57% 41% 2% 17% 57% 41% 2%
Gore 48.2 39.4% 91% 8% 1% 39% 91% 8% 1%
Bush 47.7 39.0% 10% 90% 0% 41% 10% 90% 0%
Other 2.8 2.3% 71% 21% 8% 3% 71% 21% 8%

Total 122.3 100% 52.4% 46.6% 1.0% 100% 51.4% 47.6% 1.0%
64.1 57.0 1.2 122.3 62.9 58.2 1.2















http://progressiveindependent.com/dc/dcboard.php?a...



These FACTS are never discussed in the media.
- election fraud
- undecided voters break for the challenger, especially if the incumbent is unpopular. Bush was at 48%.
- Many newly registered voters are not included in LV (likely voter) polls.
- Since 1988, Democrats have won 60-70% of new voters. In 2008, Obama had 71%+.
- MILLIONS of mostly (70-80%) Democratic votes are uncounted in every election
- The 2004/2006/2008 Final National Exit Polls indicated there were millions of returning phantom Bush voters from the prior election (more than were alive).
- The Final National and State exit polls are always FORCED TO MATCH the recorded vote.
- By definition, the RECORDED VOTE never reflects the TRUE VOTE since millions of votes are UNCOUNTED in EVERY election.
- Uncounted votes alone provide overwhelming evidence that elections were stolen in 1968, 1988, 2000 and 2004.
- 1968: 6 million net uncounted votes.
Nixon won the recorded vote by 500,000.
- 1988: 10.6 million net uncounted votes. Bush won the recorded vote by 7m.
- 2000: 5.4 million net uncounted votes. Gore won the recorded vote by 540,000.
- 2004: Nearly 4 million uncounted votes.
Bush won the recorded vote by 3.0 million.
Kerry won the True Vote by 10m.
Approximately 5 million were switched from Kerry to Bush on UNVERIFIABLE voting machines.

- 2006 midterms: Democrats won by more than double the recorded 52-46%% margin.
10-20 House seats were stolen.

- 2008: Obama won by more than double his recorded 9.5m margin.

1988-2008: the average Democratic TRUE VOTE margin was reduced from 10% to a 4% RECORDED MARGIN by Election Fraud.

VOTER FRAUD was virtually non-existent.

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Permalink | | Reply | Top

5 replies to this thread:
The Gender Vote: Further confirmation of a Kerry landslide , TruthIsAll, Fri Sep-01-06 06:39 AM
#1: rock solid, mberst, Sep 01st 2006
#2: Maybe it was rGr., bleever, Sep 03rd 2006
#3: The Graph, TruthIsAll, Sep 03rd 2006
#4: Thanks for continuing to work on this!, Melissa G, Sep 04th 2006
#5: A year ago I called this the reluctant transvestite response theory., davidgmills, Sep 16th 2006

Reply #1: rock solid
mberst Donor Click to send a private message to this memberClick to view this member's profileClick to view posts by this memberClick to add this member to your buddy list
Member since Oct 17th 2005
6510 posts
Fri Sep-01-06 08:19 PM
In response to Original Post

The shift required to make the official numbers work is not possible. It is also
not possible that people were confused as to their gender. 

You who have wept 2000 years
For one who agonized for 3 days and 3 nights

What tears will you have left
For those who agonized
Far more than 300 nights and far more than 300 days?
How hard
Shall you weep
For those who agonized through so many agonies
And they were countless

They did not believe in resurrection to eternal life
And knew you would not weep.

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Permalink | | Reply | Top

Reply #2: Maybe it was rGr.
bleever Donor Click to send a private message to this memberClick to view this member's profileClick to view posts by this memberClick to add this member to your buddy list
Member since Sep 14th 2005
9 posts
Sun Sep-03-06 11:25 AM
In response to Original Post

Reluctant gender responders; in this case men who were embarrassed to be
switching over to Bush, so they wore wigs and claimed to be women.

Hey, makes as much sense as the "official" results.

Thank you, TIA.

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Permalink | | Reply | Top

Reply #3: The Graph
TruthIsAll Moderator Click to send a private message to this memberClick to view this member's profileClick to view posts by this memberClick to add this member to your buddy list
Member since Sep 14th 2005
1399 posts
Sun Sep-03-06 05:52 PM
In response to Reply #2

 
 
Edited by TruthIsAll on Sun Sep-03-06 05:52 PM

http://progressiveindependent.com/dc/dcboard.php?a...



These FACTS are never discussed in the media.
- election fraud
- undecided voters break for the challenger, especially if the incumbent is unpopular. Bush was at 48%.
- Many newly registered voters are not included in LV (likely voter) polls.
- Since 1988, Democrats have won 60-70% of new voters. In 2008, Obama had 71%+.
- MILLIONS of mostly (70-80%) Democratic votes are uncounted in every election
- The 2004/2006/2008 Final National Exit Polls indicated there were millions of returning phantom Bush voters from the prior election (more than were alive).
- The Final National and State exit polls are always FORCED TO MATCH the recorded vote.
- By definition, the RECORDED VOTE never reflects the TRUE VOTE since millions of votes are UNCOUNTED in EVERY election.
- Uncounted votes alone provide overwhelming evidence that elections were stolen in 1968, 1988, 2000 and 2004.
- 1968: 6 million net uncounted votes.
Nixon won the recorded vote by 500,000.
- 1988: 10.6 million net uncounted votes. Bush won the recorded vote by 7m.
- 2000: 5.4 million net uncounted votes. Gore won the recorded vote by 540,000.
- 2004: Nearly 4 million uncounted votes.
Bush won the recorded vote by 3.0 million.
Kerry won the True Vote by 10m.
Approximately 5 million were switched from Kerry to Bush on UNVERIFIABLE voting machines.

- 2006 midterms: Democrats won by more than double the recorded 52-46%% margin.
10-20 House seats were stolen.

- 2008: Obama won by more than double his recorded 9.5m margin.

1988-2008: the average Democratic TRUE VOTE margin was reduced from 10% to a 4% RECORDED MARGIN by Election Fraud.

VOTER FRAUD was virtually non-existent.

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Permalink | | Reply | Top

Reply #4: Thanks for continuing to work on this!
Melissa G  Click to send a private message to this memberClick to view this member's profileClick to view posts by this memberClick to add this member to your buddy list
Member since Oct 15th 2005
31 posts
Mon Sep-04-06 07:43 PM
In response to Original Post

Thanks for never giving up on getting the truth out!
Hugs and good thoughts,
Melissa

Register ALL the People! Count ALL the Votes! Make the process Transparent and Verifiable! And do it NOW!

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Permalink | | Reply | Top

Reply #5: A year ago I called this the reluctant transvestite response theory.
davidgmills deactivated Click to send a private message to this memberClick to view this member's profileClick to view posts by this memberClick to add this member to your buddy list
Member since Sep 15th 2005
2668 posts
Sat Sep-16-06 05:30 AM
In response to Original Post

 
 

No doubt the big flip was switching of the female to male votes.

"We are the ones we've been waiting for...." The Elders, Hopi Nation.

Past liberal, past progressive, all the way to full blown dissident.... Me

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Permalink | | Reply | Top
Previous Topic | Next Topic

Important Notice: By participating on this discussion board, you agree to respect the rules of this website. Messages posted on Progressive Independent are the opinions of their authors and do not represent the opinions of Progressive Independent, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Multimedia | Reference | Links | Donate

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.